Attendees: tuexen@, rscheff@, thj@, rrs@
Discussion
- tuexen discussed how to mitigate blackhole detection problems
tuexen@ has a review to ensure we don't do blackhole detection once we are at the minimum value D24308; committed
- Discussion on what should trigger blackhole detection -- full size? Or, even smaller messages which are above our min MTU? For at least IPv6, min MTU makes sense.
- Otherwise, tuexen@'s plan remains unchanged.
- BBR and RACK needs some modifcation
Discussion of D24237: rscheff@ changed both the in-order and out-of-order data path so we call sorwakeup_locked() [when necessary] after the SACK blocks are updated. rrs@ provided feedback.
D23364: CWR with new data. This is a problem which impacts compatibility with other OSs.
D23371: tuexen@ will look into this.
D23373: tuexen@ will look into this.
D24657: Waiting for testing.
Next meeting: 21 May @ 1400 UTC