No attendees other than me (tuexen@), possibly people (at least Richard) couldn't join.
Discussion about D19622. We generally agreed on a path forward, which is to maintain fragments across interface bounces. After the fragment completes, we will use the interface pointer from the fragment that completes the packet. If the fragment gets discarded, we will suppress any operations (e.g. ICMPv6 error message; interface-specific stats) that would use the stale interface pointer from the mbuf.
Discussion about D16851. Almost done; needs final review.
Discussion about Richard's review to do some cleanup in preparation for RFC 6675 support: D18624. jtl@ has an open question. tuexen@ will look into it.
Discussion about thj@'s presentation at IETF (actually delivered by Gorry on his behalf). Response from IETF was mixed, but it was clear that this is an optional feature we are free to drop. thj@ has a review to drop this: D19960.
- Discussion about TCB size/organization. bz@ is looking into ways to automate cacheline usage analysis with a goal to enabling automatic structure organization optimization.
Next meeting is 12 Sep 2019 @ 1400 UTC.